Question

169 junior 1 students at No. 35 Middle School of Shenyang took their first no­teacher exam. After the teacher handed out the exam paper, he left the room and never came back. A student collected the papers when the exam ended.

“That test was not only a test of knowledge, but also a test of moral (道德). We wanted to show students how important honesty is，” said Cai Wenguo, the school's headmaster. The school says no cheating happened in the test. Next year, it wants 80% of its exams to be without teachers. But students have different ideas.

“I was happy and excited during the exam because my teachers trusted me，” said Lang Yudan, a 13­year­old girl in Class 11.

“Schools must trust students a lot not to use invigilators (监考人). But I think it is too early. Some students will cheat if there are no invigilators. And the students will not be able to ask for help when needed，” said Hua Sha.

“I don't like having invigilators in exams. When they walk around the classroom, they make me nervous. I would get higher marks without them in the room because I would feel more relaxed，” Liu Qingxi said.

“I think it's very important to have invigilators in exams. Many students want to check their answers with each other after they have finished papers. And they can also keep the classroom in order when something unusual happens. They may make me nervous, but I still think we need them，” Shangguan Yuan said.

Not using invigilators may be a good idea. But before using it, schools must tell students the importance of honesty and try to find ways to solve something unusual in exams.

1.The passage mainly talks about________.

A．how to pass an exam 

B．how to make students honest

C．whether there is cheating in exams 

D．whether invigilators are needed in exams

2.No. 35 Middle School of Shenyang held a no­teacher exam to________.

A．let the students have a good test    

B．teach the students in a better way

C．help all the students pass the exam  

D．find whether the students were honest

3.From what the students have said, we know________.

A．invigilators really help them a lot 

B．all of them think it is a good idea

C．something unusual never happens in exams

D．not all of them agree with the headmaster

4.What does Hua Sha think of no­teacher exams?

A．It's a good idea to have no­teacher exams but something must be done first.

B．If there are no invigilators, the students will certainly get lower marks.

C．Exams without invigilators will never be held since students are not honest.

D．She thinks it's the best way to show that schools trust their students a lot.

Answer

1.D

2.B

3.D

4.A

【解析】

试题分析：本文谈论在考试中是否需要监考老师。

1.D主旨大意题。根据对文章内容的理解可知有两名学生不同意无老师监考的考试，再根据最后一段Not using invigilators may be a good idea. But before using it, schools must tell students the importance of honesty and try to find ways to solve something unusual in exams. 没有老师的考试是个好主意，但是事先必须告诉学生们诚实的重要性并试着去找出去解决在考试中不寻常办法。可知本文在讲考试中是否需要监考人。故选D。

2.B推理判断题。根据第二段第一句“That test was not only a test of knowledge, but also a test of moral (道德). We wanted to show students how important honesty is，”可知是为了用一种更好的方式教学生。故选B。

3.D细节理解题。根据对文章内容的理解可知有两名学生不同意无老师监考的考试，故选择B。也就是说不是所有的学生都同意嚣张的安排。故选D。

4.细节理解题。根据最后一段Not using invigilators may be a good idea. But before using it, schools must tell students the importance of honesty and try to find ways to solve something unusual in exams. 没有老师的考试是个好主意，但是事先必须告诉学生们诚实的重要性并试着去找出去解决在考试中不寻常办法。可知本文在讲考试中是否需要监考人。故选A。

【名师点睛】

抓住文章主线和关键词语，归纳文章中心

要注意不是所有的段落都有主题句，有时主题句暗含在句中。阅读这样的文章，就需要自己根据文章的细节来分析，概括出段落的主题，从而推导出文章的主旨。分析的方法是：先弄清该段落主要讲了哪几方面的内容，这些内容在逻辑上有什么联系，然后加以归纳形成主题。5.根据对文章内容的理解可知有两名学生不同意无老师监考的考试，再根据最后一段Not using invigilators may be a good idea. But before using it, schools must tell students the importance of honesty and try to find ways to solve something unusual in exams. 没有老师的考试是个好主意，但是事先必须告诉学生们诚实的重要性并试着去找出去解决在考试中不寻常办法。可知本文在讲考试中是否需要监考人。故选D。

考点：考查教育类阅读